On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 2:31 PM John Snow <js...@redhat.com> wrote: > This tests most of protocol.py -- From a hacked up Coverage.py run, it's > at about 86%. There's a few error cases that aren't very well tested > yet, they're hard to induce artificially so far. I'm working on it. > > Signed-off-by: John Snow <js...@redhat.com> > --- > python/tests/null_proto.py | 70 +++++ > python/tests/protocol.py | 535 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 605 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 python/tests/null_proto.py > create mode 100644 python/tests/protocol.py > > diff --git a/python/tests/null_proto.py b/python/tests/null_proto.py > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..c8cedea5942 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/python/tests/null_proto.py >
Whoops, forgot to delete this file after inlining it into the other test. --js
