Am 26.10.2011 21:17, schrieb Pintu Kumar: > Dear Mr. Johannes, > > I am sorry but I think you took me wrong. I never asked you to do things for > me. > I just wanted few clarifications to proceed further as I was stuck > after performing few experiments as below:
You are stuck because you still didn't think about the theory before jumping to the code. Please do this before asking more questions. Both Johannes and I have told you that it's not as easy as you seem to think. When you have a design to solve the problem (and I believe it might be better to start that from scratch rather than extending vvfat as it would end up being a rewrite anyway), we can discuss that design. But it doesn't make any sense to discuss detailed changes in vvfat when you don't even seem to understand the problem. > But there is one problem here if I use the above logic. > When I issue "ls" command "vvfat_read" is not getting triggered. > So I think there is some problem and I could figure out where to > implement the dynamic scanning of sub-directory later. Why do you expect that vvfat_read is called? If the guest OS has the directory entries already cached, there's no reason for it to read them from disk. Kevin