Hi Kevin, On Thu, 27 Oct 2011, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> When you have a design to solve the problem (and I believe it might be > better to start that from scratch rather than extending vvfat as it > would end up being a rewrite anyway), we can discuss that design. I fully agree on all three accounts. VVFAT never was intended as anything more than a hack, and it was never intended for large directories/tree structures. And one fundamental problem cannot be overcome: when the host changes the underlying files. Ciao, Johannes
