On 15/12/2021 11:00, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 15.12.2021 um 10:19 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:


On 14/12/2021 15:35, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 30.11.2021 um 10:46 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
drive_add is only used in softmmu/vl.c, so it can be a static
function there, and drive_def is only a particular use case of
qemu_opts_parse_noisily, so it can be inlined.

Also remove drive_mark_claimed_by_board, as it is only defined
but not implemented (nor used) anywhere.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eespo...@redhat.com>

I don't think moving drive_add() actually improves anything. Yes, you
can make it static, but in order to do that you had to introduce
block_if_name() as a new public function and you're moving an obviously
block related function to common code in vl.c.

So this part doesn't look like a net win to me. The rest of the series
looks good to me.


So are we going to drop patch 2 and 3? For me it is fine either way, and I
saw Stefan added r-b to all patches.

If we are, Kevin are you going to apply only patch 1 and 4, or do you want
me to send v3?

This patch does a bit more than just moving drive_add(). It also inlines
drive_def() and deletes drive_mark_claimed_by_board(), which are both
things that make sense to me. So this suggests a v3.

But if you think I should just apply patches 1 and 4, I'm happy to do
that, too.

You're right, I forgot about that. I will send v3, thanks.

Emanuele


Reply via email to