On Wed, Apr 6, 2022, 10:53 AM Li Zhang <lizh...@suse.de> wrote: > On 3/31/22 16:46, John Snow wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 10:37 AM John Snow <js...@redhat.com > > <mailto:js...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 6:47 AM Li Zhang <lizh...@suse.de > > <mailto:lizh...@suse.de>> wrote: > > > > On 3/31/22 08:10, Hanna Reitz wrote: > > > On 29.03.22 18:49, Li Zhang wrote: > > >> Update what I observed. > > >> > > >> It seems that aqmp is not stable when running test cases. > > >> So I revert the patches as the following, iotest40/41 test > > cases work > > >> well. > > > > > > Thanks for bisecting. I haven’t seen this problem before, so > > I didn’t > > > look into it; CC-ing John, perhaps he figures something. > > > > > Thanks a lot. > > It happens occassionally. I didn't find a way to reproduce it > > manually. > > > > > > Sorry for the instability. > > > > A few questions then: > > > > - what operating system and version > > - kernel version > > - architecture (looks like x86 and others?) > > - what commit/version of QEMU are you testing? > > - what python version are you using to run iotests? > > > > > > I'll also point out these patchsets, because we're in different > > timezones and if I'm lucky it will be the answer: > > > > [1] https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220201041134.1237016-1-js...@redhat.com/ > > <https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220201041134.1237016-1-js...@redhat.com/> > > > > [2] https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220225205948.3693480-1-js...@redhat.com/ > > <https://patchew.org/QEMU/20220225205948.3693480-1-js...@redhat.com/> > > Thanks a lot. > > I backport aqmp related patches, it looks good to run the cases > iotest040/041. >
Excellent, thanks for reporting back!
