On 26/04/2022 20:40, Richard Henderson wrote:

On 4/26/22 05:50, Lucas Mateus Castro(alqotel) wrote:
+%xx_at          23:3 !function=times_4
+@XX3_at         ...... ... .. ..... ..... ........ ... &XX3 xt=%xx_at xb=%xx_xb

Hmm.  Depends, I suppose on whether you want acc[0-7] or vsr[0-28]
I mostly used VSR function here, but since I'll change the patch 1 to your suggestion (which will require creating acc_full_offset) I'll make a few changes to create some functions for the accumulator

+/*
+ * Packed VSX Integer GER Flags
+ * 00 - no accumulation no saturation
+ * 01 - accumulate but no saturation
+ * 10 - no accumulation but with saturation
+ * 11 - accumulate with saturation
+ */
+static inline bool get_sat(uint32_t flags)
+{
+    return flags & 0x2;
+}
+
+static inline bool get_acc(uint32_t flags)
+{
+    return flags & 0x1;
+}

Better to have separate helpers for these?  They'd be immediate operands to the function
replacing XVIGER (see below) and thus optimize well.
Do you mean different functions or a function that receives packed_flags along with the callback functions?

+#define GET_VsrN(a, i) (extract32(a->VsrB((i) / 2), (i) % 2 ? 4 : 0, 4))
+#define GET_VsrB(a, i) a->VsrB(i)
+#define GET_VsrH(a, i) a->VsrH(i)
+
+#define GET_VsrSN(a, i) (sextract32(a->VsrSB((i) / 2), (i) % 2 ? 4 : 0, 4))
+#define GET_VsrSB(a, i) a->VsrSB(i)
+#define GET_VsrSH(a, i) a->VsrSH(i)

These can be made into functions of the form

    typedef int32_t xviger_extract(ppc_vsr_t *a, int i);

In this case it'd be necessary to receive 2 xviger_extract functions since XVI8GER4* multiply one value as signed and the other as unsigned (and other integer GER treat both as signed).

An alternative would be to isolate the innermost loop into a different function, like:

    typedef int64_t do_ger(int32_t a, int32_t b, int32_t at, int32_t pmsk);

    static int64_t ger_rank4(int32_t a, int32_t b, int32_t at, int32_t mask)
    {
        int64_t psum = 0, i;
        for (i = 0; i < 4; i++, mask >>= 1) {
            if (mask & 1) {
                psum += (sextract32(a, i * 8, 8)) * (extract32(b, i * 8, 8));
           }
        }
        return psum;
    }

That way we could avoid having 'rank' as a parameter, what do you think?



diff --git a/target/ppc/internal.h b/target/ppc/internal.h
index 8094e0b033..a994d98238 100644
--- a/target/ppc/internal.h
+++ b/target/ppc/internal.h
@@ -291,4 +291,32 @@ G_NORETURN void ppc_cpu_do_unaligned_access(CPUState *cs, vaddr addr,
                                              uintptr_t retaddr);
  #endif

+/*
+ * Auxiliary functions to pack/unpack masks for GER instructions.
+ *
+ * Packed format:
+ *  Bits 0-3: xmsk
+ *  Bits 4-7: ymsk
+ *  Bits 8-15: pmsk
+ */
+static inline uint8_t ger_get_xmsk(uint32_t packed_masks)
+{
+    return packed_masks & 0xF;
+}
+
+static inline uint8_t ger_get_ymsk(uint32_t packed_masks)
+{
+    return (packed_masks >> 4) & 0xF;
+}
+
+static inline uint8_t ger_get_pmsk(uint32_t packed_masks)
+{
+    return (packed_masks >> 8) & 0xFF;
+}
+
+static inline int ger_pack_masks(int pmsk, int ymsk, int xmsk)
+{
+    return (pmsk & 0xFF) << 8 | (ymsk & 0xF) << 4 | (xmsk & 0xF);
+}

Use hw/registerfields.h.  C.f. PREDDESC in target/arm/internals.h.
Ok, will do

+static bool do_ger_XX3(DisasContext *ctx, arg_XX3 *a, uint32_t op,
+                             void (*helper)(TCGv_env, TCGv_i32, TCGv_i32, +                                            TCGv_i32, TCGv_i32, TCGv_i32))
+{
+    uint32_t mask;
+    REQUIRE_INSNS_FLAGS2(ctx, ISA310);
+    REQUIRE_VSX(ctx);
+    if (unlikely((a->xa / 4 == a->xt / 4) || (a->xb / 4 == a->xt / 4))) {
+        gen_invalid(ctx);
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    mask = 0xFFFFFFFF;
+    helper(cpu_env, tcg_constant_i32(a->xa), tcg_constant_i32(a->xb),
+           tcg_constant_i32(a->xt), tcg_constant_i32(mask),
+           tcg_constant_i32(op));
+    return true;
+}

Why are you passing register numbers instead of pointers, like everywhere else?
Because here we are not working only with 1 register per register number, the ACC uses 4 and the XVF64GER* needs to use XA and XA+1, and while VSR is an array so I could do ppc_vsr_ptr+1 I thought it was better not to access memory I was not given a pointer to, so I passed XA so I can request cpu_vsr_ptr(env, xa) and cpu_vsr_ptr(env, xa + 1)


r~
--
Lucas Mateus M. Araujo e Castro
Instituto de Pesquisas ELDORADO <https://www.eldorado.org.br/?utm_campaign=assinatura_de_e-mail&utm_medium=email&utm_source=RD+Station>
Departamento Computação Embarcada
Analista de Software Trainee
Aviso Legal - Disclaimer <https://www.eldorado.org.br/disclaimer.html>

Reply via email to