Am 21/11/2022 um 17:01 schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> Am 16.11.2022 um 13:22 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
>> These functions end up calling bdrv_create() implemented as 
>> generated_co_wrapper
>> functions.
>> In addition, they also happen to be always called in coroutine context,
>> meaning all callers are coroutine_fn.
>> This means that the g_c_w function will enter the qemu_in_coroutine()
>> case and eventually suspend (or in other words call qemu_coroutine_yield()).
>> Therefore we need to mark such functions coroutine_fn too.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eespo...@redhat.com>
> 
> Just one remark about patch ordering: This doesn't require the
> g_c_w_simple patches, so wouldn't it make more sense to move the
> g_c_w_simple right before the first patch that actually makes use of
> them?

I thought about it, but then I thought it was too far from bdrv_create
patches.
Both g_c_w_simple and this patch are needed by bdrv_create_file, so I
thought if you read this one first then you wouldn't have a clue on what
is the end goal.

Anyways, I'll change the order.

Thank you,
Emanuele

> 
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
> 


Reply via email to