On Monday, December 19, 2022 8:22:25 AM CET Volker Rümelin wrote: > Am 18.12.22 um 21:26 schrieb Christian Schoenebeck: > > On Sunday, December 18, 2022 6:15:29 PM CET Volker Rümelin wrote: > >> Some emulated audio devices allow guests to select very low > >> sample rates that the audio subsystem doesn't support. The lowest > >> supported sample rate depends on the audio backend used and in > >> most cases can be changed with various -audiodev arguments. Until > >> now, the audio_bug function emits an error message similar to the > >> following error message > >> > >> A bug was just triggered in audio_calloc > >> Save all your work and restart without audio > >> I am sorry > >> Context: > >> audio_pcm_sw_alloc_resources_out passed invalid arguments to > >> audio_calloc > >> nmemb=0 size=16 (len=0) > >> audio: Could not allocate buffer for `ac97.po' (0 samples) > >> > >> and the audio subsystem continues without sound for the affected > >> device. > >> > >> The fact that the selected sample rate is not supported is not a > >> guest error. Instead of displaying an error message, the missing > >> audio support is now logged. Simply continuing without sound is > >> correct, since the audio stream won't transport anything > >> reasonable at such high resample ratios anyway. > >> > >> The AUD_open_* functions return NULL like before. The opened > >> audio device will not be registered in the audio subsystem and > >> consequently the audio frontend callback functions will not be > >> called. The AUD_read and AUD_write functions return early in this > >> case. This is necessary because, for example, the Sound Blaster 16 > >> emulation calls AUD_write from the DMA callback function. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Volker Rümelin<vr_q...@t-online.de> > >> --- > >> audio/audio.c | 1 + > >> audio/audio_template.h | 13 +++++++++++++ > >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/audio/audio.c b/audio/audio.c > >> index d849a94a81..f6b420688d 100644 > >> --- a/audio/audio.c > >> +++ b/audio/audio.c > >> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ > >> #include "qapi/qobject-input-visitor.h" > >> #include "qapi/qapi-visit-audio.h" > >> #include "qemu/cutils.h" > >> +#include "qemu/log.h" > >> #include "qemu/module.h" > >> #include "qemu/help_option.h" > >> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h" > >> diff --git a/audio/audio_template.h b/audio/audio_template.h > >> index 720a32e57e..bfa94b4d22 100644 > >> --- a/audio/audio_template.h > >> +++ b/audio/audio_template.h > >> @@ -115,6 +115,19 @@ static int glue (audio_pcm_sw_alloc_resources_, TYPE) > >> (SW *sw) > >> #else > >> samples = (int64_t)sw->HWBUF->size * sw->ratio >> 32; > >> #endif > >> + if (samples == 0) { > >> + HW *hw = sw->hw; > >> + size_t f_fe_min; > >> + > >> + /* f_fe_min = ceil(1 [frames] * f_be [Hz] / size_be [frames]) */ > >> + f_fe_min = (hw->info.freq + HWBUF->size - 1) / HWBUF->size; > >> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, > >> + AUDIO_CAP ": The guest selected a " NAME " sample > >> rate" > >> + " of %d Hz for %s. Only sample rates >= %zu Hz are" > >> + " supported.\n", > >> + sw->info.freq, sw->name, f_fe_min); > >> + return -1; > > You probably want to `sw->buf = NULL;` before returning here, or adjust the > > condition for the error message below. > > sw->buf is always NULL here. In the audio_pcm_create_voice_pair_*() > functions we have sw = audio_calloc(__func__, 1, sizeof(*sw)) (after > patch 08/11 sw = g_new0(SW, 1)) and the audio_pcm_sw_free_resources_*() > functions also set sw->buf = NULL after freeing sw->buf.
OK > > The other thing that puzzles me, in error case these template functions > > return > > -1, which would then be feed to g_malloc*()? > > Sorry, I can't see where -1 would be fed to g_malloc*(). > > On error the audio_pcm_sw_alloc_resources_*() functions return error > code -1, and that error code propagates up to the AUD_open_*() functions > or the audio_pcm_create_voice_pair_*() functions which return NULL. I thought about patch 7 where you do: - hw = audio_calloc(__func__, 1, glue(drv->voice_size_, TYPE)); + hw = g_malloc0(glue(drv->voice_size_, TYPE)); But I just realized that it is using audio_pcm_hw_add_new_, which not returns a negative value anywhere, so fine as well: Acked-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> > > >> + } > >> > >> sw->buf = audio_calloc(__func__, samples, sizeof(struct st_sample)); > >> if (!sw->buf) { > >> > > >