On 2/21/23 23:37, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Do you mean that the doc should tell whether the address to be returned in the store access fault should be aligned and whatnot?
Yes.
By reading target/riscv code it seems that all store acess faults are being fired via raise_mmu_exception(), which is only called in riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(), which in turn doesn't do any thing special with the address before firing the exception. So I guess we can assume that badddr = aligned?
Well that's certainly how the code is written, yes. r~
