Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2023 13:19:12 -0700 > Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 May 2023 19:45:54 -0700 > > > Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Magic numbers can be confusing. > > > > > > > > Use the range size define for CXL.cachemem rather than a magic number. > > > > Update/add spec references. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com> > > > > > > I guess we should do a scrub to move all refs to 3.0 soon > > > given it's horrible having a mixture of spec versions for the references. > > > > > > For future specs, we should only do this when sufficient X.Y references > > > have started to appear - I think that's true for r3.0 now. > > > > For the kernel side I think Dan is taking the 'if you are updating it then > > update the spec' but otherwise leave it be. So since I'm touching the > > code I updated it. > > > > I agree, it is a pain to have to look at the 2.0 spec but you can do it. > > Only if you are either a member of the consortium, or happened to have > grabbed a copy in the past I think. I've had people mentioning they can't > get it today. >
Oh. :-( That seems unfortunate. I've emailed the CXL admins. Perhaps they can post an archive page or something? Ira
