On Sun Aug 6, 2023 at 9:46 PM AEST, Nicholas Piggin wrote: > On Fri Aug 4, 2023 at 6:50 PM AEST, Pavel Dovgalyuk wrote: > > BTW, there is a function qemu_register_reset_nosnapshotload that can be > > used in similar cases. > > Can you just use it without changing the code of the reset handler? > > I didn't know that, thanks for pointing it out. I'll take a closer look > at it before reposting.
Seems a bit tricky because the device tree has to be rebuilt at reset time (including snapshot load), but it uses the random number. So having a second nosnapshotload reset function might not be called in the correct order, I think? For now I will keep it as is. Thanks, Nick