From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> Hi,
Implement RAMFB migration, and add properties to enable it only on >= 8.2 machines, + a few related cleanups. Cedric, did you get the chance to test the VFIO display/ramfb code? thanks v4: (Laszlo review and suggestions) - change migrate_needed() to assert(ramfb_exists) - rename vfio_display_needed() to vfio_display_migration_needed(), update the condition and associated comment - move the ramfb-migrate option check and add a check for ramfb=on - add a stub to fix compilation on some architectures v3: - add a "x-" prefix to properties, as they are not meant for users. - RAMFB now exports a ramfb_vmstate for actual devices to include - VFIOPCIDevice now has a VFIODisplay optional subsection whenever ramfb migration is required (untested) Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859424 Marc-André Lureau (3): ramfb: add migration support ramfb-standalone: add migration support hw/vfio: add ramfb migration support hw/vfio/pci.h | 3 +++ include/hw/display/ramfb.h | 4 ++++ hw/core/machine.c | 5 +++- hw/display/ramfb-standalone.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++ hw/display/ramfb.c | 19 +++++++++++++++ hw/vfio/display.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++ hw/vfio/pci.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ stubs/ramfb.c | 2 ++ 8 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.41.0
