> Hopefully you are right, but unlikely: > https://github.com/antmicro/kvm-aosp-qemu/compare/fdd76fecdd...5.0.0-kvm-aosp
What do you mean ? On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 7:51 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 3/9/24 19:17, Mario Marietto wrote: > > @Pierrick Bouvier : > > > > ---> I'm really glad to see it worked! Are you already running the > > raspberry image, or vanilla AOSP ? > > > > No and I don't think I will. I have a project that I'm working on that > > aims to emulate Android for Arm on Linux x64 bit. I knew that it would > > be slow,but I didn't think it would be so much. When I used AVD as an > > emulator,Android went faster. > > > > > > @Peter Maydell <mailto:peter.mayd...@linaro.org> : > > > > > > I think that I've understood the reason why several years ago it worked. > > Probably I'd used this special version of qemu : > > > > > > https://github.com/antmicro/kvm-aosp-qemu/releases/tag/5.0.0-kvm-aosp > > <https://github.com/antmicro/kvm-aosp-qemu/releases/tag/5.0.0-kvm-aosp> > > > > I'm sure that it contains the necessary patches to be able to boot > > Android 10 on the Jetson Nano. > > Hopefully you are right, but unlikely: > > https://github.com/antmicro/kvm-aosp-qemu/compare/fdd76fecdd...5.0.0-kvm-aosp > > Also, quoting Eric Blake: > > On technical lists, it's best to avoid top-posting, and to > instead reply inline to make the conversation easier to follow; > it's also okay to trim quoted parts irrelevant to your reply, > as it can be assumed that anyone joining the conversation can > find the public list archives to catch up on the full thread. > > Regards, > > Phil. > -- Mario.
