On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:31:14 -0400, Camilo Polymeris <cpolyme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your comment. For those reasons and the ones I mentioned in > the original mail, I think I'll be going the C++ route.
Sorry to insist, but I think this is not a good choice. We already had experiance with several non-core C++ plugins, some of them extremely useful, and all of them are essentially unavailable to users. On the other hand, it is probably unfeasible to add a dependency on SAGA. The single > argument that seems to favour Python is the greater availability of > coders. Giovanni and Gianluca have responded to this mail saying they > would work on a Python version. No other C++ coders interested, yet :( This should mean something, even though it is not the crucial issue. All the best. -- http://faunalia.it/pc _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer