> Sorry to insist, but I think this is not a good choice. We already had > experiance with several non-core C++ plugins, some of them extremely > useful, and all of them are essentially unavailable to users. On the other > hand, it is probably unfeasible to add a dependency on SAGA.
What I don't understand is: we'd have the same problems using python. There are, as far as I know, no Python-saga packages. Debian's libsaga[2], for instance, does *not* include python bindings. That means we'd have to compile & ship the python-saga binding ourselves, anyway. Or am I missing something? Are you, Gianluca, using the command-line interface to saga or the python bindings? That former is very interesting as a compile-free option, but ultimately is limited to certain tasks and to having saga_cmd installed. Both options (command line and API) are not exclusive. Regards, Camilo [2] http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/amd64/libsaga/filelist _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer