Hi Alessandro, On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Alessandro Pasotti <apaso...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm not sayng that this new system is perfect but I'm asking myself > why there is a so strong lack of interest for it.
IMHO there's only one really missing feature: more integration between the plugin site and the Redmine trac. Ok to keep each developer free to choose the preferred tracking system, but I think that the plugin site should suggest to create a new project on the Redmine. Furthermore I'd like if in the plugin details page there's a link to report an issue or just to go to the trac page (Redmine or whatever). The plugin site will be the user interface of the "QGis plugins system", so that kind of integration is required IMHO, it can do the difference! Just my 2 cents. > I feel that, even if it could certainly be improved, the new system is > better than the old one and should replace it ASAP. +1, I agree with you. Regards. > Thanks. > > > > > 2011/10/1 Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it>: >> Hi all. >> Organization of the metting is starting. Please let us know if you need >> financial >> help to participate, so we can work out a budget. >> Please also help us soliciting potential donors and sponsors. >> All the best. >> -- >> Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia >> www.faunalia.eu >> Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> > > > > -- > Alessandro Pasotti > w3: www.itopen.it > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > -- Giuseppe Sucameli _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
