Hi, +1 for Alister ideas too! I just finished a topological reference dataset for hydrology, and both functionnalities would be have been wonderful . I had to switch a lot between GRASS, FME and postgis to build some geometries by hand (copy obecjt in qgis, paste wkt in pgadmin, finish work using postgis functions, updating in postgis.. ).
Visualising topology errors could be generic, as we have two models for topology: grass and postgis 2.0.. Or shouldn't we just focus on postgis as the reference topology model for qgis , and let GRASS visualisation as it is in GRASS UI. Is topology in Postgis a OGC standard? IMHO we should keep sticking to standards.. Regis -- View this message in context: http://osgeo-org.1560.n6.nabble.com/GSoC-ideas-tp4491887p4501905.html Sent from the Quantum GIS - Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
