>> On testing saturation today, I did notice a potential bug with that setting. >> For my test raster, I set the saturation to 1 and the difference between >> that setting and 0 was quite large. If I move to 2, 3, 4, and so on, the >> differences are very small and incremental. >> >> I'm wondering why the leap in saturation from 0 to 1? Is something incorrect >> in the algorithm calculating saturation? It seems as the values between 0 >> and 1 need to be handled to make the 0 to 1 change as incrementally small as >> the 1 to 2. >> > > Can you create a bug report about this and attach your raster to it > (if possible)? I'll take a look at this and see what's happening... >
Actually - I can replicate it here. Don't worry about attaching a raster. Nyall _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
