On Apr 18, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On testing saturation today, I did notice a potential bug with that >>> setting. For my test raster, I set the saturation to 1 and the difference >>> between that setting and 0 was quite large. If I move to 2, 3, 4, and so >>> on, the differences are very small and incremental. >>> >>> I'm wondering why the leap in saturation from 0 to 1? Is something >>> incorrect in the algorithm calculating saturation? It seems as the values >>> between 0 and 1 need to be handled to make the 0 to 1 change as >>> incrementally small as the 1 to 2. >>> >> >> Can you create a bug report about this and attach your raster to it >> (if possible)? I'll take a look at this and see what's happening... >> > > Actually - I can replicate it here. Don't worry about attaching a raster. > > Nyall Hi Nyall, I'm just getting back to this, so I don't know if a bug report is still required or if you worked on it already. I'm building trunk now and will followup with a bug report if the issue persists. Regards, John _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
