Well, my original reaction when I saw the File->Project change was that it's very non-standard, and may cause more cofusion than it's worth. Certainly on OS X, maybe on other systems.
People know what the "File" menu means, even if the main object of an application is a "project", or video or email or whatever. Same goes for the "Edit" menu. And it's standard position is right next to the File menu. Undo, Redo, Cut, Copy and Paste are the basics for the edit menu, and should work in dialog text boxes for copying and pasting text, as well as whatever document editing they may do. Do not move Undo/Redo, more confusion. I realize that this may be Mac-centric, but the OS X HI Guidelines seem to be generally followed or adapted on other systems, and these File and Edit menu changes are a bit radical. On Apr 24, 2013, at 6:07 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > Ramon, > > I would agree with those points. In fact I think the menu structure as is > doesn't make much sense and the Edit menu should be renamed to Feature/s. > > What does Edit mean: > > - Edit Layer > - Edit Feature > - Edit Project > > If you look at all the tools in the Edit menu they are all related to the > current feature or features. The undo and redo actions should be moved to > the layer menu. > > Here are my thoughts on the Layer menu: > > http://i.imgur.com/oYO55Qz.png > > Moving the Add xxx Layer to the project menu would mean you follow these > actions when creating a new project: > > Project -> New > Project -> Add xxx Layer > > Change the style > > Layer -> Properties > > That is a more logical flow IMO then currently what is there. > > Thoughts? > > - Nathan > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Ramon Andiñach <cust...@westnet.com.au> > wrote: > > On 24/04/2013, at 05:55 , Ramon Andiñach wrote: > > > > > On 24/04/2013, at 04:28 , John C. Tull wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I was having some discussion on IRC today with Tim and Larry about the > >> recent change to the menu in trunk. Before, the menu used "File" and that > >> was changed to "Project". My position is that it does not seem Mac-like, > >> whether or not a QGIS document resides in the filesystem as a .qgs file or > >> if your "Project" is fed from a database, something apparently planned for > >> the future of QGIS. > >> > >> I'd be interested in feedback from other Mac users on this. I'm flexible > >> to the change, but wanted to vet this and see if anyone else had a strong > >> opinion one way or the other. Please make it clear if you are a Mac OS X > >> user or not. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> John > > > > Interesting. I'd say this is going to look as odd at home on my mac as at > > work on their windows box. No file menu - that's going to look very > > unfamiliar. > > > > That said, it's a good name. It does describe what's in there - those > > commands work on the project-file not a layer-file. > > > > -ramon. > > Ok. I've been standing at the bottom of a large-ish hole today, so if this > sounds like a dumb idea that's my excuse. > > Could we move Layer across next to Project? > > > Some reasoning. > 1. If we're abandoning File in favour of Project, then there's possibly no > reason to retain Edit next to it either. Other than historical ones. > 2. Project and Layer are largely about opening, closing, saving (and other > similar things) files. Project files in one menu and Layers (vectors, > rasters, DB, etc) in the other. > 3. Then you have a more logical progression from left to right about how to > use QGIS. (Open stuff, change stuff) > > -ramon. > (OK, 1. is not so good, but it does open the door to ask questions!) > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer ----- William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com> http://www.kyngchaos.com/ "Mon Dieu! but they are all alike. Cheating, murdering, lying, fighting, and all for things that the beasts of the jungle would not deign to possess - money to purchase the effeminate pleasures of weaklings. And yet withal bound down by silly customs that make them slaves to their unhappy lot while firm in the belief that they be the lords of creation enjoying the only real pleasures of existence.... - the wisdom of Tarzan _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
