It is indeed. - Nathan
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Mathieu Pellerin <nirvn.a...@gmail.com>wrote: > So what's the hard deadline for SIP, this coming weekend? > > > > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Mathieu Pellerin <nirvn.a...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> I feel that for the SIP upgrade to be considered so late in the release >>> process, it should be considered within _reasonable confines_ to avoid >>> un-managed, harmful delays. Ideally, something along the lines of "merged >>> by this coming Sunday or delayed to post 2.0". If the attempt at >>> upgrading SIP is turning out to be more complex and take longer than a hard >>> commit-to-master deadline, it IMO should be postponed on practical grounds >>> of avoiding impact on QGIS end users and adoption. >>> >> >> This is the current plan. Victor is working on updating sextante this >> week, and Alex is working on fTools, noone has put their hands up for the >> others (DBManger, mapserver export) yet but I will try my hand at them if I >> get time. >> >> The SIP update must happen now or it can't happen in the future without >> breaking everything yet again, and that will do more damage to the project >> then some slight breakages in plugins while they update to 2.0. The SIP >> update is a easy one, for the core code base and plugin authors, and I only >> have to check one thing with Martin before I will merge it into master >> (after most of the core plugins are done). >> >> - Nathan >> > >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer