+1 from me to renaming. Maybe we can use "Processing" or "GeoProcessing" as new name.
2013/8/10 Nathan Woodrow <madman...@gmail.com>: > +1 from me too. > > Personally I find the core plugin concept unnecessary. If it's core it > shouldn't be a plugin and should just be part of the main program. It can > still be Python that is fine however users shouldn't have to turn them on > and off they should just be there and be transparent. > > IMO we should aim to kill of all C++ core plugins in 2.1 and make them core > features.Things like the geometry checking, spatial join, georeferencer > should all be core features and have C++ and Python APIs that the user can > use. > > - Nathan -- Alexander Bruy _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
