Thanks for bringing this up Paolo!
Am 16.01.2014, 18:30 Uhr, schrieb Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it>:
Let me explain what I mean:
http://www.faunalia.eu/~paolo/vector.png
http://www.faunalia.eu/~paolo/raster.png
* in vector, after Scale I have some empty space
* in raster all options are in collapsible submenus, whereas in vector
one should press More options >> and it finds them on the side; I donot
know which solution is better (I incline for the raster one, butI'm not
a GUI expert), but I think they should be consistent
+1 There should definitely be consistency between the vector and raster
"save as" dialogs.
Imho, the raster solution where all options are aligned in one column is
preferable.
I also see quite a big empty area in the left column when I open the
vector "save as" dialog. I can decrease the height of the dialog manually
but it jumps back to the bigger size once I open "more options".
* CRS selector is different
In case of CRS selector, I think I prefer the raster solution. Here's why:
1. The raster solution has only one dropdown box where the vector solution
needs a dropdown and a text box; 2. The vector solution is confusing
because the CRS name in the (greyed out) text box is not updated when the
user changes between layer, project, and selected CRS.
* I see no point in having an empty collapsible box (Datasource Options,
Layer Options for Shapefiles)
+ 1 for no empty collapsible boxes.
* minor stuff could be made more consistent (e.g. Save as is over the
box in vector,
and on the side in raster; Capitals should be only for the first word)
The raster dialog lacks the very useful "Add saved file to project"
checkbox.
Another small thing: I don't know about your experience, but I would very
much like to have the "Add saved file to project" checkbox ticked by
default.
Best wishes,
Anita
--
anitagraser.com
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
