I'd just like to second the notion of an easier install for mac, an installer
would be great, and I'd really like it if, just like the osgeo installer, you
could specify that you want the oracle support installed too-
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:41 AM, William Kyngesburye <[email protected]>
wrote:
It should be possible, there is a build option to do that, though I haven't
fully tested it. (GSL is bundled, I keep forgetting to ask someone to fix the
QGIS donwload page to remove that requirement.)
You would miss out on GDAL driver plugins, especially those with
non-GPL-compatible licenses. They would still need separate installers, and I
would have to figure out where to install them. Probably a QGIS application
support mirroring GDAL's, though it could share use of the normal GDAL plugins.
Not in the application, not proper.
Required python modules are another thing that would be needed to be bundled.
But users would still need to separately install other Python modules needed by
any QGIS plugins they installed.
About the installer vs. drag-n-drop: the installer is needed for compiling the python scripts and
creating the browser alias. Drag-n-drop is not the only "normal" installation method on
OS X. Installers are just as "normal".
Besides sharing GDAL with other software, GDAL and the Python modules are very
useful on their own, and I hear from many people who do use them separately
from and alongside QGIS.
One thing I'm not sure about, if QGIS knows to specify the GDAL resource dir
(datums, projections, ...) if it's not at the default location programmed into
GDAL. And that goes for not only GDAL as a library, but the GDAL tools and
GDAL python. (and other libraries that have resource dirs like PROJ and
geotiff)
I have considered an alternative: putting the current GDAL and Python module
installers on the QGIS installer disk image. It's one download, but users
would still have to install each of them in the right order.
The problem with this, and another problem with the bundling method, is that
when any of the pieces change, I have to package the whole thing again (and
with bundling that means saving the compiled source and running the make
install again to do the bundling, and hope that something doesn't trigger a
recompile). And the user has to download the whole monster again and install
it.
On Nov 6, 2014, at 3:20 AM, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if we could offer "all in one" OSX QGIS packages in the future?
The average OSX user is afraid of installing separate frameworks - even if its
very simple. The normal install way on OSX is just drag and drop to the
applications folder.
Is there a particular technical reason why we cannot include GDAL/GSL into the
QGIS package? I know that it wouldn't be shared with other FOSSGIS software
then - but would this matter a lot?
Andreas
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-----
William Kyngesburye <kyngchaos*at*kyngchaos*dot*com>
http://www.kyngchaos.com/
[Trillian] What are you supposed to do WITH a maniacally depressed robot?
[Marvin] You think you have problems? What are you supposed to do if you ARE
a maniacally depressed robot? No, don't try and answer, I'm 50,000 times more
intelligent than you and even I don't know the answer...
- HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
