+1 to full postpone for me. I don't like the idea of shipping something that is slower and snapping is slow. Those are core features of a GIS.
Nathan On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 3:22 pm Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 23 June 2015 at 13:42, Martin Dobias <wonder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > One heretic idea at the end - what others think about postponing the > > release of the new geometry architecture to 2.12 so that there is more > > time to address the current issues (fix performance, fix high memory > > consumption, clean up API, write unit tests). It seems to me that some > > of the issues would be difficult to address even if the release of > > 2.10 is moved by another week or so. > > I'd be a cautious +1 to this - but I'm also concerned about the impact > of reverting this work now. Scary stuff, but like you said, I'm not > confident we can get the new geometry work into a release-ready shape > in 3 days... (Also, who is expected to do this? AFAIK all the > sponsored bug fixing has been exhausted for 2.10). > > Nyall > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
