Hi Radim, On Tue, 30. Jun 2015 at 17:54:42 +0200, Radim Blazek wrote: > Ah, sorry, the question about 2.10.1 was more for Jef, I mean if it makes > sense to do the workaround with mutex in QGIS and backport it to 2.10 branch. > Anyway, seeing the terms in Debian, we have to fix it in master.
There will be a 2.10.1 - because of cc13c57 [0]. Odd, that 72c9830 went in right before feature freeze, went unnoticed for all of it and is discovered right after release - even before the announcement. Not sure if we should do 2.10.1 right away, maybe there's more... Jürgen [0] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/commit/cc13c574a092348dba70d17a8d95e808cab5f627 -- Jürgen E. Fischer norBIT GmbH Tel. +49-4931-918175-31 Dipl.-Inf. (FH) Rheinstraße 13 Fax. +49-4931-918175-50 Software Engineer D-26506 Norden http://www.norbit.de QGIS release manager (PSC) Germany IRC: jef on FreeNode
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer