Hi Alex, Il 15/05/2017 13:19, Alexander Bruy ha scritto:
> I suggest not to rush with releasing and publishing any of the plugins. > Please don't forget that QGIS 2.14, 2.16 and 2.18 still have all providers > built in. For master I personally don't see any benefits in releasing > Processing providers right now. These plugins will be broken most of the > time as Processing suffers from major refactoring, QGIS API also is not > stablized yet. > > As Victor said, if someone wants to take ownership on R provider, I wlll be > happy to move it. Otherwise I will try to do my best to keep it working. thanks for this. I understand it may still be early for coding, unless people @OTB have plans to support OTB6 also on 2.18 (if this is not too complicated). I think it would however be good to start with the basics: creating the repo/transferring owneship, etc. In this way the work can start soon after the API have reasonably stabilized (I imagine around June or July). All the best. -- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
