On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Nyall Dawson <nyall.daw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 June 2017 at 18:21, G. Allegri <gioha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 1. Allowing multiple field selection for grouping > > 2. Keeping attributes of first feature when grouping > > > > > > I will accept this criteria, obviously, if it's the preferred solution > for > > the mosts. > > I just want to report that many users (partecipants to courses or > customers) > > say they find having the "first feature value" misleading. > > I agree with them. I would set the field values only for the grouping > > fields, having the same value within the group, and set null for the > other > > fields. > > > > The problem raises during a long workflow. At some point you obtain a > > dataset with unconsisten field values, and it's not always obvious to > know > > when and.which field value was set miningless. > > That's fair enough reasoning. Paolo/Anita are you OK with that logic? Sounds OK to me if it is possible to select multiple grouping fields. Best wishes, Anita
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
