On 08/14/2018 02:23 AM, Nyall Dawson wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 18:11, Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it> wrote: >> I agree, better be conservative. Furthermore, not always lack of feedback >> means an issue is not valid. I'd be against automatically closing the issues >> without further verification. > I agree in general, but there's a lot of tickets recently with just a > crash dump (with no clues in the dump) and no further info about how > to reproduce the crash or what triggered it. These reports don't have > *any* value on their own. > In these cases I'd agree in closing it after 2-4 weeks wiithout further comments. My point is that this required human intervention, I do not see a reliable way of doing it automatically without missing useful info. All the best.
-- Paolo Cavallini - www.faunalia.eu QGIS & PostGIS courses: http://www.faunalia.eu/training.html https://www.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&geo=IT&q=qgis,arcgis _______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
