Well, my point is that in exceptional cases, that could be of course discussed, but not at every release. Régis
Le jeu. 6 sept. 2018 à 18:38, Paolo Cavallini <cavall...@faunalia.it> a écrit : > Hi Regis, > so in short your proposal is no exemption? > All the best. > > Il 6 settembre 2018 18:21:29 CEST, "Régis Haubourg" < > regis.haubo...@gmail.com> ha scritto: >> >> Hi all, >> maybe from a voter point of view, this is uncomfortable to vote for last >> minute exemptions, as this does not have such sense from a democratic >> perspective. >> Voting is essential on strategic issues, but voting on "do you want this >> now, or within 4 months" may not appear so important - except if you funded >> the feature yourself. >> >> As a user, I'd really want the two mentioned features for the next LTR, >> I've wanted them for so long. But in the other hand, I think we should >> really not end into a systematic feature freeze exemption process. >> >> I know QGIS is a do-ocraty, and we owe so much to our top contributors >> that we can't refuse them anything, hum... professionally speaking I mean:-) >> >> However having work still going on while in feature freeze does not help >> in dedicating fully to bugfixing and testing. >> >> Last point, some teams have been rescheduling hard and sometimes >> canceling deserved vacations to respect feature freeze deadline. Just to be >> clear, this doesn't concern Oslandia this time, but this happened in the >> past. >> Seen from this perspective, I'd like we don't repeat this at every >> release. Customer usually can wait for 4 months more. >> >> Regards, >> Régis >> >> >> Le mer. 5 sept. 2018 à 09:13, Matthias Kuhn <matth...@opengis.ch> a >> écrit : >> >>> Thanks Paolo >>> >>> On 09/05/2018 09:02 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote: >>> > Hi Matthias >>> > >>> > >>> > Il 09/05/2018 08:35 AM, Matthias Kuhn ha scritto: >>> >> I think the approach to let voting members decide as we did last time >>> >> (https://www.loomio.org/d/38Aiya0q/3-0-soft-freeze-exemptions) works >>> fine. >>> >> >>> >> * This committee includes several technical members >>> >> * Everyone is free to vote or not, based on self-evaluation of >>> knowledge >>> > it makes sense to me - perhaps this should be particularly stressed in >>> > the voting question, otherwise people will feel obliged to vote (which >>> > often means +1) even when they cannot grasp the implication. >>> >>> Yes, we can state that explicitly. >>> >>> In the past, e.g. here >>> https://www.loomio.org/p/BPc3Wj6l/duplicate-feature-redigitized we had >>> 33% participation. Not sure what the reason for abstaining was, one >>> assumption would be that many did not feel comfortable enough to make a >>> decision. Or pure lazyness or disinterest ;P >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>> QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org >>> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >> >> > -- > Sorry for being short >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list QGIS-Developer@lists.osgeo.org List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer