Hi Harrissou, Should we ask on the users mailing list?
Regards, Jacky On Fri Nov 21, 2025 at 10:17 AM CET, DelazJ via QGIS-Developer wrote: > Hi devs, > I didn't get any reply so I wonder if it is because nobody knows, nobody > cares, or something else... > Other than the concern of "adding/keeping a broken tool" in QGIS, we have a > PR in the docs we don't really know how to finalize, so a feedback would be > appreciated. > > Thanks. > Regards, > Harrissou (for the docs team) > > Le mar. 28 oct. 2025 à 10:38, DelazJ <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> Hi Devs, >> In the "Geometry checker" core plugin, there is that option >> called "Polygons must follow boundaries of layer ...", of which a >> Processing alg "Polygons exceeding boundaries" was recently created. >> While testing the algorithm in order to properly document it, we came >> across weird results (also output by the geometry checker) that we are >> unable to explain/understand their coherence. >> >> Issues and discussion are availabel at >> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/issues/63454 and >> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Documentation/pull/10314#issuecomment-3425649278 >> >> 1/ Does anyone *KNOW* how this option is really supposed to check? and >> understand the logic behind the output? >> 2/ If there is agreement that this tool does not adress any real use case, >> is it something we want to keep in QGIS (in this state)? >> >> Looking forward to your replies. >> Regards, >> Harrissou >> -- Jacky Volpes - Oslandia Ingénieur développeur SIG
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
