On Fri, 16 Jan 2026, 5:46 pm Stefanos Natsis, <[email protected]> wrote:
> I thought since 3.20 all .0 versions are marked as "release candidate" > Yeah but this would be marking ALL 4.0.x releases as beta, not just 4.0.0 Nyall > Stefanos > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 at 09:31, Régis Haubourg <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Well, my IT department updates packages in our software portal whenever >> they ... want or users ask. >> >> Maybe we should explicitly name 4.0 "release candidate" in the package >> names and our communication if 4.0 is that broken. >> Regis >> >> >> Le 16 janvier 2026 01:49:16 GMT+01:00, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC < >> [email protected]> a écrit : >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 19:30, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > Regarding testing/bugfixing. >>> > >>> > I hope and I assume that companies and organizations wouldn't have the >>> idea to base their mission critical work on a .0 release ... but rather >>> wait for the next LT version or a couple of patch releases until QGIS 4.x >>> can mature further. >>> >>> Definitely -- it's not going to be anywhere NEAR enterprise ready 🤣. (I >>> just ran into the known issue where the qt6 builds can corrupt your user >>> profiles... someone should probably look into that one sometime!) >>> >>> Nyall >>> >>> > >>> > Andreas >>> > >>> > On 2026-01-15 08:01, Stefanos Natsis via QGIS-PSC wrote: >>> > >>> > I'm also +1, however I'm slightly worried that we should somehow >>> compensate for the reduced testing/bugfixing time of this feature-rich >>> release. >>> > >>> > Best >>> > Stefanos >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 08:37, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 16:00, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > +1 - to have a voice from PSC ;-) >>> > >>> > Perfect, thanks Andreas! >>> > >>> > Nyall >>> > >>> > > >>> > > Andreas >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 03:50, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >>> > >> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 01:23, Martin Dobias <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >> > >>> > >> > Hi all >>> > >> > >>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 10:21 PM Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> I'm wondering if we could possibly push back the feature freeze >>> date >>> > >> >> by 1-1.5 weeks for this cycle? >>> > >> >> >>> > >> > >>> > >> > +1 from me. >>> > >> >>> > >> So do we consider this locked in now? Freeze moved to 27th Jan? >>> > >> >>> > >> Nyall >>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>> > >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>> > >> [email protected] >>> > >> List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> > >> Unsubscribe: >>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Andreas Neumann >>> > > QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer) >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > QGIS-Developer mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > QGIS-PSC mailing list >>> > [email protected] >>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc >>> > >>> > >>> >>
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
