Yes that sounds like a good plan to me too. Marco Bernasocchi
QGIS.org Chair OSGEO.org VP Europe OPENGIS.ch CEO http://berna.io On Fri, 16 Jan 2026, 11:10 Stefanos Natsis via QGIS-PSC, < [email protected]> wrote: > Aha, thanks for clarifying that! > I'd be +1 for extending the "release candidate" status to more patch > releases. We could reconsider its removal before each patch release of the > 4.0. cycle, though, based on the current state at the time. > > Stefanos > > On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 at 09:55, Nyall Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026, 5:46 pm Stefanos Natsis, <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I thought since 3.20 all .0 versions are marked as "release candidate" >>> >> >> Yeah but this would be marking ALL 4.0.x releases as beta, not just 4.0.0 >> >> Nyall >> >> >>> Stefanos >>> >>> On Fri, 16 Jan 2026 at 09:31, Régis Haubourg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Well, my IT department updates packages in our software portal >>>> whenever they ... want or users ask. >>>> >>>> Maybe we should explicitly name 4.0 "release candidate" in the package >>>> names and our communication if 4.0 is that broken. >>>> Regis >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 16 janvier 2026 01:49:16 GMT+01:00, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC < >>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 19:30, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Hi all, >>>>> > >>>>> > Regarding testing/bugfixing. >>>>> > >>>>> > I hope and I assume that companies and organizations wouldn't have >>>>> the idea to base their mission critical work on a .0 release ... but >>>>> rather >>>>> wait for the next LT version or a couple of patch releases until QGIS 4.x >>>>> can mature further. >>>>> >>>>> Definitely -- it's not going to be anywhere NEAR enterprise ready 🤣. >>>>> (I just ran into the known issue where the qt6 builds can corrupt your >>>>> user >>>>> profiles... someone should probably look into that one sometime!) >>>>> >>>>> Nyall >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > Andreas >>>>> > >>>>> > On 2026-01-15 08:01, Stefanos Natsis via QGIS-PSC wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > I'm also +1, however I'm slightly worried that we should somehow >>>>> compensate for the reduced testing/bugfixing time of this feature-rich >>>>> release. >>>>> > >>>>> > Best >>>>> > Stefanos >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 08:37, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 16:00, Andreas Neumann <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > +1 - to have a voice from PSC ;-) >>>>> > >>>>> > Perfect, thanks Andreas! >>>>> > >>>>> > Nyall >>>>> > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Andreas >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > On Thu, 15 Jan 2026 at 03:50, Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 at 01:23, Martin Dobias <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > Hi all >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 10:21 PM Nyall Dawson via QGIS-PSC < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> I'm wondering if we could possibly push back the feature >>>>> freeze date >>>>> > >> >> by 1-1.5 weeks for this cycle? >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >> > >>>>> > >> > +1 from me. >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> So do we consider this locked in now? Freeze moved to 27th Jan? >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> Nyall >>>>> > >> _______________________________________________ >>>>> > >> QGIS-Developer mailing list >>>>> > >> [email protected] >>>>> > >> List info: >>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>> > >> Unsubscribe: >>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > -- >>>>> > > >>>>> > > -- >>>>> > > Andreas Neumann >>>>> > > QGIS.ORG board member (treasurer) >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > QGIS-Developer mailing list >>>>> > [email protected] >>>>> > List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > QGIS-PSC mailing list >>>>> > [email protected] >>>>> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ > QGIS-PSC mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-psc >
_______________________________________________ QGIS-Developer mailing list [email protected] List info: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
