Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: > At 11:56 �� 8/2/2002 +0000, you wrote: > >> Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: >> >>> At 09:24 �� 8/2/2002 +0100, you wrote: >>> >>> Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: >>> Because of Slaveing... For example for my 27 Meg Animation for the >>> IFCD after you're done, so's the QL! Nothing loads fast... >>> ..... Phoebus >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> What has DEL_DEFB got to do with the Slaving blocks? Or is there no >> relation whatsoever? >> Fran�ois Van Emelen > > > > I neglected to say here that my original animation is having the > problem, not the second version with a series of pics following each > other.. As Claus said BGIMAGE is not affected (and that's how the > problem was solved... but you can't have 27 megs of uncompressed data > for 2 secs of animation if you know what I mean...) >
Sorry,my question didn't refer to your animation. I'll rephrase it. The slave blocks grab some memory and DEL_DEFB releases some. Is the released memory the one grabbed by th slave blocks? fran�ois Van Emelen
