At 01:13 �� 9/2/2002 +0000, you wrote: >Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: > >>At 11:56 �� 8/2/2002 +0000, you wrote: >> >>>Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: >>> >>>>At 09:24 �� 8/2/2002 +0100, you wrote: >>>> >>>>Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: >>>>Because of Slaveing... For example for my 27 Meg Animation for the IFCD >>>>after you're done, so's the QL! Nothing loads fast... >>>>..... Phoebus >>> >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>> >>>What has DEL_DEFB got to do with the Slaving blocks? Or is there no >>>relation whatsoever? >>>Fran�ois Van Emelen >> >>I neglected to say here that my original animation is having the problem, >>not the second version with a series of pics following each other.. As >>Claus said BGIMAGE is not affected (and that's how the problem was >>solved... but you can't have 27 megs of uncompressed data for 2 secs of >>animation if you know what I mean...) > >Sorry,my question didn't refer to your animation. I'll rephrase it. >The slave blocks grab some memory and DEL_DEFB releases some. Is the >released memory the one grabbed by th slave blocks? >fran�ois Van Emelen > >
I see no mentioning of DEL.DEFB in my docs here... I'll look some more Phoebus
