Dilwyn Jones wrote: > Agreed to some extent, although equally we are using Windoze, Intel > hardware etc to further our QLing. Those of us on this list who use > PeeCee's need to have the underlying hardware and system software > working properly to be able to use our emulators in the most efficient > way, so I don't see that talk of 'other systems' is necessarily wrong > on this list (though we could always use Dave's QL-Chat which was > created for the purpose) as long as the discussion and help requests > is directly or indirectly related to the QL side of things. > > My own saga with the Epson USB drivers illustrates this I think - > without solving this I wasn't able to use my PC properly which in turn > prevented me using QPC2 properly. Unless I can resolve this, there's > no point reinstalling QPC2 and all the QXL.WINs if I have to > subsequently update my backups and reinstall everything again. Point > in question is that although the Epson is easily used via the parallel > port, I wish to use the parallel port to daisy chain my parallel port > scanner and Zip drive. Any two will work on that interface, the three > together won't. Sorry Dilwyn, your problem was not directly related to QPC, I do not think it was appropriate for this group. I wonder if a Mac user of Q-Emulator would have gotten the same reaction from you. This is why the Norwich Quanta group barely exists now, an ex-Quanta committee member insinuated that we do not exist right in front of us. This the slippery slope to oblivion.
-- Tarquin Mills Reboot Movement (An Anti-Wintel Campaign) http://www.speccyverse.me.uk/comp/reboot/ _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List