----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Firshman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 9:04 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 at 20:57:47, John Sadler wrote: > (ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "John Gilpin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 10:48 PM > >Subject: Re: [ql-users] Perfection: my take on it > > > > > >> The Membership databases from Quanta have a number of possible contact > >> addresses both snail and email BUT would I be contravening the Data > >> Protection Act by revealing the same? > > >>htm > > > >Not if they have given their express permission > It is all totally academic. The address and email are what he publishes > in his advertising! > > His address has been public knowledge since the mid 80s. > His email would have been too if there had been email then (8-)# > > Tony So, if they are so easy to find, what is all this topic about? It is obvious that Quanta's help is not required (again) :-( John Gilpin. _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.quanta.org.uk/mailing.htm
