On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:01:02 -0400, Marcel Kilgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
Yes but that would be beyond the scope of QPC (to run Linux) anyway;

Of course. Who would want to do that if native Linux is better supported and magnitudes faster?


There are reasons like learning the architecture or testing executables in an emulated environment. After all for most applications where a 68K architecture is involved, development takes place in another system.


The JIT idea itself I've toyed with often, but I guess most people are
already happy with the speed as it is. QemuFast is a remarkable
achievement in this respect.

Absolutely, however the tradeoff with specifically QemuFast is reduced compatibility (unless steps are taken to trap the problems)


Ffibys
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
  • ... Aurélien GÉRÔME
    • ... pgraf
      • ... Aurélien GÉRÔME
        • ... Aurélien GÉRÔME
        • ... Marcel Kilgus
          • ... Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος)
            • ... Marcel Kilgus
              • ... Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος)
          • ... Aurélien GÉRÔME
      • ... Roy wood
        • ... Aurélien GÉRÔME
    • ... Dilwyn Jones
    • ... pgraf

Reply via email to