John Gilpin wrote: > Can I ask those of you who were interested in this software to advise me if > the source code is necessarily required or should I continue with my > negotiations as outlined above without the source code being provided?
Sorry, I completely forgot to answer your mail. QMAC being free would be a great thing. Regarding the rest, on one hand it would be a shame if the source code, any source code, would get lost. That's the reason why I've been collecting all sources I could ever get my hands on. On the other hand, I wouldn't spend much money on it, that's not worth it. QMAC works and it works well as it is. Anything further is covered by the well supported GWASS. Cheers, Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
