I agree, Derek, leaving TK_VER$ unaltered would be a better idea. Thus,
there is less chance of any change upsetting existing programs, while new
programs can use the new keyword.
Dilwyn
-----Original Message-----
From: Derek via Ql-Users
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2017 5:23 PM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Cc: Derek
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] TURBO and testing it exists
Hi George,
I proposed in th QL Forum adding a S or Q in the TK_VER$.
But your proposed new Function sounds a good idea.
RegardsDerek
-------- Original message --------From: gdgqler--- via Ql-Users
<ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> Date: 19/08/2017 13:12 (GMT+00:00) To:
ql-us...@q-v-d.com Cc: gdgq...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] TURBO and
testing it exists
On 19 Aug 2017, at 09:21, gdgqler--- via Ql-Users
<ql-users@lists.q-v-d.com> wrote:
I would think it possible to have TK_VER$ print “TK”, “SMS” or “REM” after
the version number. Is this what people would like?
It might be better to have a new keyword, TK_TYPE$, which would return “TK”,
“SMS” or “REM”. This would leave TK_VER$ unaltered.
George
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
QL-Users Mailing List
