Malcolm Cadman wrote: > Are the earlier versions of SMSQ/E that different ? Or is it QPC2 that > is masking the problem by not going 'fatal' ? Whatever it is, I don't think it's QPC. SBASIC is very platform independent. The only thing which is possible is that the SMSQ floating point functions have a bug whereas the QPC ones haven't. Marcel
- [ql-users] SBASIC error message Christopher Cave
- Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message Marcel Kilgus
- [ql-users] SBASIC error message Christopher Cave
- Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message Marcel Kilgus