Re: [ql-users] SBASIC error message

[Malcolm Cadman]

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>Malcolm Cadman wrote: 
>> Are the earlier versions of SMSQ/E that different ?  Or is it QPC2 that
>> is masking the problem by not going 'fatal' ?
>
>Whatever it is, I don't think it's QPC. SBASIC is very platform
>independent. The only thing which is possible is that the SMSQ
>floating point functions have a bug whereas the QPC ones haven't.

Knowing you, that is quite likely :-)

-- 
Malcolm Cadman