On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:25:02PM +0100, Malcolm Cadman wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > >I am really looking forward to this. > >Just imagine: booting 10 seconds, dialing in and getting your emails. > >Easier than walking to your mail-box. I am tired of booting Linux. > > What ? ... the 'sacred' Linux has problems too :-) who says it is a Linux problem? As I see it the problem is that he doesn't have enough Q60 to run Linux and SMSQ at the same time. Bye Richard
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Geoff Wicks
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Martin Wheatley
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD cgraf
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Ian Pizer
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD cgraf
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] HTML- Mail was QL Emulators CD Malcolm Cadman