In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >On Fri, 3 Aug 2001 at 20:20:00, Malcolm Cadman wrote: >(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) > >>Tony maybe getting more, as I believe he has permanent link, rather than >>a dial up ? >Well I am on the net a great deal (programming for wn.com) but that >wouldn't affect me getting emails. I guess I am simply in a lot of >people's address books. I don;t send them out though, firstly 'cos I >run Demon's Turnpike, but also 'cos I have not opened any of them. Umm ... its just 'tough it out' then :-) Perhaps we could all post back an advert for the QL ... that would shock 'em ... using an anonymous hotmail address of course ! -- Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Adrian Vickers
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Richard Zidlicky
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Andrew Halliwell
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Timothy Swenson
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Martin Wheatley
- Re: [ql-users] Virus John Hitchcock
- Re: [ql-users] Virus Dilwyn Jones