RE: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list

[Dave]

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:

> [ND] I think your hardware posts are pretty tedious -
> [RZ] but they are on-topic....
> Yes, I agree, and didn't say that they weren't. However, there is a
> ql-developers list for hardware ?
> So, effectively, all the hardware stuff in ql-users *is* OT in that respect
> - no-one has complained about that.

Well, hardware *development* has an appropriate group, but general
hardware discussion belongs here as much as anywhere...

Can a listmom please write a charter for the list, which automatically
gets mailed out to all new signups, and defines what's on or off topic,
how large .sigs can be, etc? :o)

Also, if anyone feels any specialist lists should be set up (ql-advocacy,
ql-pubchat, ql-fetist anyone? ;) I run a listserver.

Dave
ql.spodmail.com