Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: 
> I've just spoken to Tony Tebby. He agreeD, in principle, to make
> SMSQ/ Open Source.

Ah, interesting. What means "in principle"? And what is the commercial
status supposed to be?

> We do have to find somebody to act as a sort of registrar, though, 
> to make sure that we have a coherent development.

Well, I suppose the amount of people actually doing something with the
code will be quite limited. It's no easy stuff to deal with.

So I might be able to do the job if necessary. But there's a lot to
talk about first...

Marcel

Reply via email to