wlenerz writes:
> On 29 May 2002, at 20:50, Lafe McCorkle wrote: > > > >What about 2.99, 2.A0, 2.A1 ,2.A2 ........all the way to 2.FF? > > > > > Nothing wrong with putting a little Hex on it to stay in space. > > > Sound great to me! Except the counting is somewhat exotic. I mean if we go from decimal to hex then the next number after 2.99 is 2.64 which is rather confusing, hence my suggestion 2$64. If we pretend to assume that the counting always was in hex then 2.9A would be more logical. 2.A0 might imply that were starting all over again - which we are in a way - but then 3.00 seems just as good. Please lets not start a war over this ;) It was only meant as a bit of fun. Per
