On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 at 21:35:35, Bill Waugh wrote: (ref: <008301c2659c$6533eac0$862c073e@famwaugh>)
> > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Tony Firshman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 2:07 PM >Subject: Re: [ql-users] Parcelfarce >when I send them they are correctly formatted, if you recieve them wrongly >formmated then when you send them back they reformat correctly before I >recieve them, or are you suggesting that OE sends them wrong and then when >it recieve replies corrects them before it displays them. I have no idea. I see the original with absolutely no '>' indents at all, and I am not the only one it seems. My quoted text, and your reply are all with no indents. When I reply they are still wrongly formatted with one '>', and when you reply to me with the second level '>>' they are _still wrongly formatted. I really cannot see how they can possibly arrive to you correctly formatted. Have a look again - I think you are simply not seeing the bad formatting. > >> >> I agree - it makes his emails very difficult to understand. > >Norman was speaking of Quote marks he did'nt mention indenting What are quote marks then - that is a new one on me. You have snipped Norman's comment. I have always thought quote marks in email ocntext were the '>' at the beginning of line. >We need to ascertain what we both mean by 'Indented and 'formatted' I am >assuming you mean the placing of an > against text, one > for every level of >reply Yes indeed. -- QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:252/67) +44(0)1442-828255 tony@<surname>.demon.co.uk http://www.firshman.demon.co.uk Voice: +44(0)1442-828254 Fax: +44(0)1442-828255 TF Services, 29 Longfield Road, TRING, Herts, HP23 4DG