??? 6/10/2002 6:14:44 ??, ?/? "Michael Berger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ??????: <snip> >... >To come back to the beginning of the discussion: the good news - I am >convinced that this newsgroup with its fashion of > (or >> or >>>) as state >of the art of attachments is definitely non-vulnerable for this kind of >attack. > >
Well I imagine you mean the quoting of text. That has nothing to do with attachments unfortunately, so yes the group is VERY vulnerable to attacks (at least all those which these worms target) Phoebus
