On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 07:10:51PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> > Maybe it's time for a qmail-ldap-hackers list and public anoncvs...
> I think we can discuss any hackers stuff on this list. Anoncvs is not
> possible since we are not allowed to distribute the modified source
> code of qmail. So patches is the only way to go...
Oh yes, forgot this.�fear cvs for the patches doesn't make too much sense ;-))
I'm not to sure about Bernsteins policy here, he sometimes tells something
like "you should not distribute patches, but modified qmail-whatever.c" -
but didn't find this on his pages. Did you ever asked him for a permission
to distribute qmail-ldap as standalone source instead of patch?
I still think a seperate hackers list would make sense. I think discussing
new features for the next version there would make sense too, as
distributing "beta"-patches or so - this could prevent some errors in the
"official" released patch.
There could also interoperability issues with the various add-on patches be
discussed.
Greetings
Henning
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
